Articles & Reports
 

The Origins and Survival of Littlethorpe Potteries in the Context of British Country Pottery-Making

     
 

GENERAL CONCLUSIONS

Historic and economic context of the Littlethorpe works

The area south of Ripon between Littlethorpe and Bishop Monkton probably remained unenclosed, poorly drained moorland until at least the mid-eighteenth century. The earliest hint of clay working in the vicinity of Littlethorpe is provided by the inclusion of the place-name, 'Claypitts', in late seventeenth century deeds covering the districts of Thorpe and neighbouring Bondgate. These and other documents suggest that the area was exploited for its resources of clay and sand, as well as for seasonal pasture. Following enclosure and drainage, the heavy nature of the soil prevented intensive arable farming and led to the prevalence of stock farming as the dominant form of land-use.

Alongside farming, small-scale production of brick, tile and pottery developed along the incipient Pottery Lane from the early 1830s. While some of these works were appendages to farms and probably operated on a seasonal basis, others operated more independently of farming interests. The surviving works complex, which was the first of those set up along Pottery Lane, seems from the outset to have been part of the group operating independently of farming interests, functioning from at least the early 1830s as a specialist producer of pottery, bricks, tiles and drainpipes. Correspondingly, the study area contains structures and features associated with a wide range of activities, while adjacent clayworking sites in the Pottery Lane corridor display a much narrower range of features, reflecting the restricted time-scale and reduced range of activities practised there.

Significance of the Littlethorpe works

The present pottery making complex and similar sites along Pottery Lane, including a redundant kiln immediately west of the surviving works, form a cluster of highly visible industrial sites which also includes the Ripon-Ure canal to the east and former Ripon-Thirsk Railway to the west. Within the pottery complex most of the surviving buildings and associated features and appliances date from the nineteenth century and are in most cases specifically designed to function in the context of a pottery works. Unique to the works are its use of on-site clay reserves, transported by means of a fixed-engine waggonway, processed using late-nineteenth century blunger and pug machines, and thrown on a double-cone pottery wheel. In addition to the surviving visible structures and features, a number of other clay-working activities are documented which may have left traces now buried by later deposits.25

The present pottery works has seen continuous pottery production since the late Georgian period and, as such, is unique in Britain. The involvement of the Curtis family at the works since 1912 or 1913 has preserved traditional techniques and processes of pottery-making which would otherwise have been lost, thereby enhancing the site's present historical significance as a repository, or reservoir, of traditional skills.26

Taking a rather wider perspective, Littlethorpe may also be regarded as linked by tradition and common practice to other European traditions which have been subject to flows of ideas and motor habits since the reappearance and spread of wheel throwing in many parts of Europe around 1000 A.D. The importance of Littlethorpe is enhanced by the rarity of such potteries elsewhere in Northern Europe and the rapid demise of many in Central and Southern Europe which, until recently, survived in much greater numbers (Carlton 1999a & 1999b).27

Finally, the site should undoubtedly be regarded as of considerable scholarly significance, providing an example of organisational change and adaptability to changing markets which are reflected in the changing nature of its products through time, and in visible and sub-surface structural remains. The growing awareness in ceramic studies of the need to use surviving traditional producers to key into interpretations of past production systems (cf. Peacock 1982) suggests that Littlethorpe may offer exceptional potential for further research, particularly since the majority of such studies (e.g. Kramer 1997; Deal 1998) have previously been carried out in non-industrial, non-European contexts and are therefore of dubious value when considering the interpretation of pottery from post-medieval contexts in Northern Europe.

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge the assistance of all who have assisted in recording various aspects of Littlethorpe potteries since 1999, in particular Mark Jackson, Bob Johnson and Alan Williams. I am also grateful to Jeffrey Jones for suggesting this paper and commenting on an early draft, and to two anonymous reviewers, some of whose constructive suggestions have been incorporated, as far as possible, into the present text, while others will be taken into account in subsequent papers which, it is hoped, will expand on the social history and contemporary working practices of the works. Above all, however, I am grateful to Roly Curtis for accepting repeated intrusions into his workshop and work schedule, for unfailingly responding to obtuse questions with good humour and allowing part of his land to be dug up by student archaeologists. His sublime skills continue to inspire those who aspire to follow the course of British country potting.


Contents

Notes

25. Excavations in Summer 2000, for example, revealed abandoned brick & tile drying stands and a waggonway in the area between the present works complex and clay pits area. back  to article

26. The historical connection can be taken further by including George Curtis snr., a bargeman on the Ripon-Ure canal who delivered coal to the works and may have played a part in George Curtis Jnr's involvement there. back  to article

27. In such regions as Iberia and the Western Balkans, where country potteries and brickworks often operated on a seasonal basis in support of the main economic activity, farming, their closure has led to the extinction of highly evolved manufacturing and stylistic traditions (Carlton 1999a & 1999b). back  to article


Bibliography

ALGAR D, LIGHT A & P TREHANE, 1979, The Verwood and District Potteries: a Dorset Industry. C J Newsome & Associates.

BARTON K J, 1975, Pottery in England from 3500BC to AD1730. London; David & Charles.

BENNETT J & BENNETT J, 1993, A Guide to the Industrial Archaeology of Cumbria. Association for Industrial Archaeology/Cumbria Industrial History Society.

BLENKINSOPP B, 1998, Wetheriggs Pottery: a history and collectors guide. Kendal: Spencer Publications.

BOND J, GOSLING S & RHODES J, 1980, The Clay Industries of Oxfordshire: Oxfordshire Brickmakers. Oxfordshire Museums Service Pub. No. 14.

BRANNAM P, 1982, A Family Business: the story of a pottery. Peter Brannam.

BREARS P D C, 1971a, The English Country Pottery: its history and techniques. David & Charles, Newton Abbot.

BREARS P D C, 1971b, Farnham Potteries. Chichester: Phillimore & Co., Ltd.

BURRISON J A, 1997, Survivors: The Country Potters of Post-Industrial England, The Studio Potter, Vol. 26, no. 1, 68-77.

BURRISON J A, 1998, The Living Tradition of English Country Pottery, Folk Life 1997-98, 25-39.

CALDWELL D H & DEAN V E, 1992, The Pottery Industry at Throsk, Stirlingshire, in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries; Post-Medieval Archaeology 26, 1-46.

CARLTON R, 1998, The Past and Future of Traditional Pottery-Making in Bosnia, The Studio Potter 27, 1.

CARLTON R J, 1999 The Pirocanci Pottery-Making Tradition in Former Yugoslavia,

The Studio Potter 27, 2, 98-99.

CARLTON R J, 2001, The Littlethorpe Potteries Project; Universities of Durham and Newcastle Archaeological Reports Series (Archaeological Reports for 1999). The University of Durham.

CELORIA F, 1971, Edward Dobson's 'A Rudimentary Treatise on the Manufacture of Bricks and Tiles' (1850): edited with an introduction, biography, notes, bibliography and index; in Journal of Ceramic History, No.5 (Gen. Ed. A R Mountford). Stafford: George Street Press.

CELORIA F, 1973, Ceramic Machinery of the nineteenth century in the Potteries and in other parts of Britain; Staffordshire Archaeology 2, 11-48.

CHAFFERS W, 1901, The Collector's Book of Marks and Monograms on Pottery and Porcelain of the Renaissance and Modern Periods (revised edition). London: Reeves and Turner.

COLEMAN-SMITH R & PEARSON T, 1988, Excavations in the Donyatt Potteries. Chichester: Phillimore & Co., Ltd.

COVERDALE J M, 1964, Ripon Official Guide. Ripon Corporation.

DAVISON P J, 1986, Brickworks of the North East. Gateshead Libraries and Arts Service.

DEAL M, 1998, Pottery Ethnoarchaeology in the Central Maya Highlands. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.

DOUGLAS G & OGLETHORPE M, 1993, Brick, Tile and Fireclay Industries in Scotland. RCAHM - Scotland.

FRDC (Flaxton Rural DC), 1955, Flaxton Rural District, Yorkshire: the official guide (2 nd edn.). The Home Publishing Co.

GRABHAM O, 1916, Yorkshire Potteries, Pots and Potters. Ann. Rep. Yorks. Phil. Soc. (for 1915).

GRAHAM D, 1999, Old Absalom's wheels keep on turning, British Archaeology no. 41, 12-13.

HADFIELD C, 1972, The Canals of Yorkshire and North East England. David & Charles, Newton Abbott.

KELLY & Co., 1877, Directory of the West Riding of Yorkshire, Volume 1. London: Kelly & Co.

KRAMER C, 1997, Pottery in Rajasthan; Ethnoarchaeology in Two Indian Cities. Washngton & London: Smithsonian Institution Press.

LAWRENCE H, 1974, Yorkshire Pots and Potteries. Newton Abbot: David and Charles.

LEWIS J M, 1982, The Ewenny Potteries. Cardiff: National Museum of Wales.

McCARTHY M R & BROOKS C M, 1988, Medieval Pottery in Britain AD 900-1600. Leicester University Press.

McGARVA A, 2000, Country Pottery: Traditional Earthenware of Britain. London: A & C Black.

NYFWI, 1991, North Yorkshire Federation North Yorkshire Village Book of Women's Institutes.

OMNIBUS, 1975, Big Ware. BBC.

PEACOCK D P S, 1982, Pottery in the Roman World: an ethnoarchaeological approach. London: Longman.

RICE P, M HAILE, V MARGRIE & E DANA, 1993, Sam Haile, Potter and Painter 1909-1948. London: Bellew Publishing.

RIGBY V & FREESTONE I, 1917, Ceramic Changes in Late Iron Age Britain; in Freestone I and D Gaimster (eds.), Pottery in the making: world ceramic traditions, 56-61. London: British Museum Press.

RMBC (Ripon Motor Boat Club), 1986, A Short History of the Ure Navigation and Guide from Ripon to Newburn. Ripon.

SELLERS M, 1912, Pottery; in A History of the County of York, Volume II (Victoria County Histories).

SIMCO A, 1998, The Clay Industries - Step 1 Report. English Heritage - Monument Protection Programme.

SNELL J, n.d. (c.1980), Wetheriggs Country Pottery: nineteenth century industrial monument. Wetheriggs

STEBBING N, MELLOR M & RHODES J, 1980, The Clay Industries of Oxfordshire: Oxfordshire Potters. Oxfordshire Museums Service Pub. No. 13.

SWAN V G, 1984, The Pottery Kilns of Roman Britain. R.C.H.M.E.

SYKES R D, 1950, Clay and the Potter. City of Leeds Training College - unpub. thesis.

WHELLAN T, 1871, History and Topography of the City of York and North Riding, Volume 3.

WHITE A, 1989, Country Pottery from Burton in Lonsdale. Lancaster City Museums, Local Studies no. 10.

WILSON P R (ed.), 1989, Crambeck Roman Pottery Industry. Roman Antiquities Section; Yorkshire Archaeological Society.

YOUNG D, 1979, The Verwood Potteries. Proc. Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society.

Top of the page | Download Word document | Contents

 
 

PuebloPotteryDotCom
Jo Dahn

The Origins and Survival of Littlethorpe Potteries in the Context of British Country Pottery-Making'
Richard Carlton

Design in Center and Periphery: Three Generations of Armenian Ceramic Artists in Jerusalem
Nurith Kenaan-Kedar
Tel-Aviv University


Obituaries

 
         
The Origins and Survival of Littlethorpe  • Issue 4