Articles |
|||
Watchers and Memory Alison Lochhead |
|||||||||||||||||
Abstract
Influence/inspiration My work has always been attached to the landscape, but I do not use it directly or try to reproduce or illustrate it. Instead I take the textures, colours, atmospheres, the scars humans have cut into it, and the memories which are contained within it. Every landscape will reveal a fragment of the past, a part of someone’s story, and a life lived. This is never static; it is only a captured moment in time, which time itself also alters and puts its own mark and interpretation upon. Nothing tells of the whole life, or of the whole situation, there can be no wholeness, there is not ‘only one story’. There can be no such stated interpretation, only our own reading of what we see and feel, and each person will interpret in a different way. It is all fragments and fragmented.
I have long been fascinated by the marks made by humans on the landscape; for example, the hill forts and the burial chambers, beneath the earth-cover the remains of the dead and their social order. The links are strong between death and birth, between the foetal positions of the dead and the bodies entombed in ‘pregnant shaped’ mounds. The land tells of stories, both beneath it and on its surface. What looks like a colourful abstract painting takes on a different meaning when on a closer look the shapes and patterns are the scars made by machinery; the undulations and shadows show the workings of a mine. To make such a landscape involves human effort and suffering and often slave-like conditions of labour, and many die extracting from the earth.
Flying over the Tigris and Euphrates, glorious in their shapes, colours, textures, and rhythms, they look so beautiful and give so much hope and pleasure. Yet to focus down and to read into the landscape about its history and present reality, and to reveal the destruction of an area in Baghdad and the eviction and oppression of the Marsh Arabs, gives another vision. The building of the separation wall in Palestine will be a scar and a reminder of the division, the abuse of power and resulting hatreds, long after it is no longer visible above ground. No matter how much the rubble is cleared, the wall taken down, and the marsh restored, the marks will remain and the memory of what happened will be retained. In Afghanistan where the mud houses were bombed, they remain fragile, torn, and exposed, and then return to the earth, but the earth the houses are made from will have a different construction; it will never return in the same way it came out and will always retain its story. The story the land reveals is often one of brutality, the horrors and destruction of humans rather than the positive and the calm. Often skeletons show signs of an untimely death, with broken bones, embedded axe heads, and fractured skulls. Other buried bodies, such as the ‘bog people’ show evidence of garrotting and ritual killing. In spite of the suddenness of destruction in Pompeii the remains reveal so much of that moment. I am left wanting to know more about what is being exposed and what the scenes of death reveal about the lives and stories of the people who are made known to us. At times it feels like being a voyeur looking in on another’s private life, a tiny snatch of it made known and easy to misinterpret; ‘the fragment’.
There are visible linkages between the past and the present, the textures of the skin of the dead often eerily reminiscent of the living. There are similarities of feeling and texture between ageing skin, the skin of the recently dead, and the oil covered skin of an oil worker in Kuwait after the explosions of the wells during the Gulf War. The questions about what is in the present and what is in the past, what informs and feeds what, is a constant uncertainty. The oil worker extracting from the past to feed the present can make it difficult to differentiate between past and present, between what is above ground and what below. I ponder about what is going into the land now to inform the future and what is rising from within it to try to reveal itself to me and inform our present living. Where does responsibility lie to learn from the past in order not to repeat the stories and destructions revealed to us?
Images of massacres, the bodies left to rot, as in the recent genocide in Rwanda, reflect horrors of today, but are also reminiscent of the unearthed bog people, the exposed mass graves; the land will remember what has been put into it. The embedded hatreds of the past, which keep revealing themselves and are embedded in the land, seem to constantly rise up to take revenge on the present. The shadows of bodies left behind, as those in Hiroshima, make the living determined to never let that happen again. As memory fades and a new generation emerges without the immediate history, then the determination also changes and fades. Sometimes we manage to try to say ‘enough is enough’ but usually the hatred, the misinterpretations, the bias and narrow mindedness are overwhelming and continue the cycles of insecurity and violence. |
|||||||||||||||||
Watchers and Memory Issue 8 |